Efrat, Israel "Make two golden cherubs, beating them out as one
piece from the ends of the cover (of the Holy Ark)
.spreading their
wings upwards
" (Exodus 25: 18-20)
The Ark-Cover in the Biblical Sanctuary, punctuated on both ends with
cherubs, has left a strong imprint on our western art consciousness,
countless images of winged, angelic creatures with exquisitely young and
innocent faces. And indeed our classical Biblical commentaries Rashi
(1040 1105), based on a Talmudic passage (B.T. Hagiga 13b), derives
the Hebrew word K'ruv from the Aramaic rubis, literally a young person.
Apparently the symbolism of this imagery comes to teach that the
whole-hearted purity of our future generations must maintain the
continuity of the Divine Teaching within the Ark, thereby protecting it.
However, there is a radically different image of cherubs in a much
earlier passage in the Book of Genesis, described along with the
expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden after they eat of the
forbidden fruit: "
And He placed the cherubs at the east of the
Garden of Eden, along with the flaming, revolving sword, to guard the
path leading to the Tree of (eternal) life" (Genesis 3:24). And in
explaining the cherubs of this verse, Rashi comments, "angels of
destruction." How can the same image of cherubs symbolize such two
contrasting ideas?
One possible resolution may be that a young, innocent child has enormous
potential to study and develop in Torah but the possibility always
exists for him to turn in another negatively destructive direction. The
crucial issue becomes in which environment he is placed: if he is sent
to serious academies of Torah learning from Nursery School onwards, and
he is inspired to stand close to the Holy Ark, the chances are great
that he be a cherub guarding the Torah; but if he is left to his own
devices, placed in an unsupervised fashion next to an internet or
television which have programs of violence and sexual immorality, the
likelihood is that he will be drawn to the revolving sword and may G-d
forbid develop into an agent of destruction.
But the distinction is not as clear-cut as my previous argument might
suggest. I have often been confronted in my rabbinical career by parents
who have seemingly done all the right things, sent their children to all
the "right" schools and have nevertheless suffered the
heart-ache of seeing their offspring veer far from the traditional paths
of religious observance. Certainly there can be no fool-proof for
success; every individual is a world unto him/herself, born with his/her
own genetic proclivities, subject to influences from un-expected and
far-flung directions. But our Biblical portion does suggest at least
by innuendo yet another critical variable the interior accoutrements
of our Sanctuary are an ark (aron, literally a closet) a menorah
(candelabrum), a table, and an altar. The first three are immediately
recognizable as the necessary furnishings of a home; and when we
remember that the Sanctuary was the primary institution of the Israelite
Religious establishment, the message which cries out to us is that our
synagogues and schools must express the same warmth, love, sensitivity
and individual concern as parents express for the children in their
household. Our Sages have made this principle a cardinal aspect in the
qualifications for a teacher: " 'And you shall teach Torah
diligently to your children' these are your students, who must
always be referred to as your children" (Deut. 6:7, see Rashi ad
loc).
And if the school, study hall and synagogue must have the familial
warmth of a home, certainly a home must have the loving sensitivity
which children have the right to expect from parents. There are
instances especially when each parent is involved in a high-powered and
pressurizing professional pursuit when a household becomes
reminiscent of a bus-station, with each member on his/her own time
table, when everyone rarely meets together at one time, and when they
do, they generally crash into one another. Children would like to feel
that at least for their parents they are the highest priority. This
means receiving a parents' undivided attention during a conversation
without his/her answering a cell-phone or reading an SMS at the same
time and receiving quantity (and not just quality) time from the
parent. Indeed, for children, quantity time is quality time, as my wife
is fond of saying. Indeed, my children fault me to this day for having
been there for emergency situations, but only for emergency situations;
Imma was always there for us and that prevented many emergency
situations from occurring! Perhaps this explains the altar, the place of
sacrifice. Parents, teachers and rabbis must make sacrifices take
away from their own professional and private time to give time to
their children, students and congregants, who have the right to expect
them to do so.
In the final analysis, however, I would suggest an altogether different
resolution to the question of the two types of Biblical cherubs, the
cherubs at the ends of the Ark Cover and the cherubs guarding the
tree of life with the revolving sword. I write these words only a few
days after two newly freed terrorist prisoners walked into a Yeshiva
High School dormitory in Kibbutz Kfar Etzion at 10:30 p.m. last Thursday
evening with the intent to murder innocents. Miraculously, they first
entered a class-room where the counselors were having a meeting rather
than the Bet-Midrash Study Hall where many students were still learning.
The counselors, unlike the students, were armed and shot the
terrorists dead before they could do any damage. The counselors are
young and innocent, just released from their years in Yeshivat Hesder,
with faces very reminiscent of the cherubs. Fortunately, they were armed
with their modern-day "revolving swords," and successfully
guarded the path to the Tree of Life.
The Torah is truly our tree of life. Our youth- our cherubs must
preserve and protect it. They do it by studying it and they do it by
defending it against our enemies. Both are angels, soldiers in the army
of the Lord.