Shabbat Shalom: Parshat Matot Numbers 30:2-32:42
By Shlomo Riskin
Efrat, Israel - “ And Moses gave to them, - to the children of Gad, to the
children of Reuven, and to half the tribe of Menashe - the kingdom of Sihon the
King of the Emorites, and the kingdom of Og the King of the Bashan...”
(Numbers 32: 33)
From where did this half tribe of Menashe come into the story? Initially Moses
had been approached by the tribes of Gad and Reuven to allow them to remain on
Trans-Jordan where there was ample grazing lands for their abundant cattle
(Numbers 32: 1,2). Moses explains to them that only after they participate in
the battle for the conquest of the rest of the land of Israel together with
their brothers of the other tribes will they be permitted to receive
Trans-Jordan as their inheritance, and they agree to Moses’ conditions. And
then, when Trans-Jordan is given, we suddenly find one-half of the tribe of
Menashe entering as partners in the Trans-Jordan land parcels. When and why did
the half-tribe of Menashe enter the scene?
The Ramban is sensitive to this issue, and suggests that, although Moses had
initially been approached only by Gad and Reuven, it soon became apparent that
the land in Trans-Jordan was plentiful enough to include another partner. Moses
called for volunteers, and members of the tribe of Menashe responded to his
call, “perhaps because they were also herdsmen seeking grazing lands”
(Numbers 32: 33, Ramban as/oc)
I would add that perhaps they volunteered for another reason altogether: perhaps
they were materialistic opportunists, seeking lush farmland and desiring to be
distanced from the more spiritual tribe of Judah, from the more centralized
location of the Sanctuary, from the eventual divinely-centered capital city of
Jerusalem. In this regard the people of Menashe were acting true to their
namesake and tribal forbear: remember that Joseph says about the name he chose
for his eldest son Menashe, “G-d has enabled me to forget (nashe’, forget)
all of my toil and everything involved in my father’s house,” including much
of the Abrahamic traditions. Moreover, Menashe was the politically adept,
linguistically fluent son who aided his father in his sale of grain to the
various representatives of various countries of the world; he was not like his
younger brother Ephraim, who studied Torah with his elderly grandfather, Jacob -
Yisrael. And indeed, it would seem that these two and one-half tribes did
attempt to build an altar to Idolatry in their Trans-Jordan land during the
period of Joshua, until they were dissuaded from doing so by a delegation of
Pinhas together with representatives from the rest of the tribes (Joshua
22:12-19). Apparently geographical distance from Jerusalem creates ideological
difference as well - until this very day.
A very different scenario is suggested by the Naziv, Rav Naftali Zvi Yehuda
Berlin, in his late nineteenth century Biblical commentary called HaAmek Davar.
He insists that Moses specifically chose half the tribe of Menashe to join
together with Gad and Reuven in Trans-Jordan because Moses was concerned lest
“far from the eye makes one far from the heart” since absence often makes
the heart grow absent. After all, the ancient and persistent enemies of the land
of Israel and the Torah of Israel were Datan and Aviram, scions of the
disgruntled and “disinherited” tribe Reuven; leaving the tribe of Reuven so
far away and isolated from mainstream Israel was certainly asking for trouble.
And the tribe of Menashe, on the other hand, were perfect “religious
supervisors” (mashgihim ruhaniim) for the less trustworthy Reuven. Did not the
wise, the righteous, the committed lovers of Israel, the daughters of Zelafhad,
come from the tribe of Menashe? And Yair (“he will shine forth light,”
literally) the son of Menashe (Deut. 3:14) is considered by our Talmudic Sages
to have been equal to the majority of the Sanhedrin.
Hence the sincerely Zionistic and learned tribe of Menashe are the perfect
individuals to religiously influence the suspect tribe of Reuven, who together
with Gad, were to be far from the spiritual center of the land of Israel and so
removed from the majority of the Israelite tribes. They were to serve in a
capacity very similar to Habad emissaries or Amiel Rabbis of the Joseph Straus
Rabbinical Seminary, emissaries to Jews in far-flung places, to bring the
traditional religious message to those who are distanced from it, geographically
as well as ideologically.
And why only half the tribe of Menashe? When someone is sent to a far-flung
community, hopefully he will influence them - but the danger always exists that
they will influence him. If half the tribe still has another familial half -
uncles, aunts, brothers, sisters, cousins - closer to the religious center,
chances are that the emissaries will make frequent visitations to, and receive
familial visitors from, the more religiously involved central areas; this
situation of frequent communication between family members of the tribe of
Menashe enhances the chances that the emissaries will remain unchanged, and firm
in the commitment with which they must inspire their neighbors in Trans-Jordan.
Shabbat Shalom
Shlomo Riskin
Chancellor Ohr Torah Stone
Chief Rabbi - Efrat Israel
Home | About Us | Institutions | Guest House | Contact Us